Skip to main content

What I Learnt from Comparing Payment Industry with Railway Industry

5 years as product manager in Payment industry, I’ve worked on products from mobile wallet to gateway, and know how each player in the industry work and make or loss money. I consider payment industry as an infrastructure industry, an enabler for value exchange and creation. Let me explain why:

When I say infrastructure, you may think about railways, roads, cellular network etc, the main characteristics of these systems are: 
  • Massive and connected (in most places); 
  • End users don’t consume the network directly but through a “vehicle” (train of the railway; car for the road etc); 
  • End users of the network pay to use the facility; 
  • Ownership differ by level of criticalness (most important owned by gov, regulators or MNC; smaller ones by province, city or companies); 
  • Network owners and “vehicle” owners are in constant conflicts that both facilitate and hold back innovation.

And payment industry is the same:
  • All providers are connected (or you can’t pay while traveling);
  • Credit cards, debit cards, cheques and cash etc are the “vehicle” of payment industry
  • Merchants and consumers pay various fees for using the network (“Merchant Discount Rate” or MDR is the most typical fee)
  • National switch connect banks and financial institutions are usually owned by the country, card schema (Visa/MasterCard) are almost regulators and  mobile wallets (e.g. PayPal) and other smaller parts owned by others;
  • The most recent struggle being on mobile payment, it is a “vehicle” innovation, when the “vehicle” hits the road, the road is not supporting because it needs an upgrade to support such “vehicle”, the wrestling goes on

The reason I am making this comparison is because it makes it easier to understand what is the current situation and what will be the likely future for the payment industry, in other words, where the opportunities and threats and how we “define” them.
L
ooking at the railroad industry for example, we know that simply, the innovation is either about the railway or the “vehicle”. Take the 2 newsletter I received from “The Paypers” and “PYMNTS.COM” yesterday, the list of articles are as follows:
  • SIX Payment Services deploys smart payment terminals for the Swiss Post (Railroad)
  • Paytm integrates UPI payments system for wallet recharge  (Railroad)
  • Amazon sets off pilot programme in India for people selling old products  (Railroad)
  • Kraken announces the support for Monero trading on its platform  (Railroad)
  • Bitcoin Breaks $1,000 (Vehicle)
  • More Holiday Shoppers Made Mobile Purchases This Season (Vehicle)
  • The Traditional Payments Player Role in The FinTech World (Railroad and Vehicle)

These articles represents 70% of all the articles in the newsletters, the other 30%, of course, is about regulation and crimes.  These two creates their own market, the more regulation, the more crime; the more crime, the more regulation. One thing they don’t create, in most cases, is “Value” and “Opportunities". If everybody drive in a good way, we don’t need traffic lights and police.

So what are the key indicators of a company or technology that suggest if it is an “opportunity”?

First, let’s see if it is “Railroad” or “vehicle” or how the “Railroad” or “vehicle” can use it, take the block chain technology for example, it is a material, which is great because the whole network will be using it. ApplePay for example, is a “vehicle”, actually, it is more like a better wheel on a old car (credit card) that runs on the same road (contactless terminals).

Then let’s look at if it process the key criteria to be successful in the sector it belongs. For example, as a payment material it needs to fulfill one or several of the following criteria:
  • Reduce cost (producing, transporting, exchanging, circulating, ownership and governance)
  • Increase speed (producing, transporting, exchanging, circulating and verifying)

If it is “vehicle”, then the key criteria will be:

  • Affordability (it can be created and bought and used in an inexpensive way; money wise and effort wise)
  • Have existing and expanding end points (therefore plenty of places to use it)
  • Security (allows continuous use of the vehicle and no harm to the railroad and passenger)

If it is a “railroad”, then the key criteria will be:

  • Connectivity (it enables a vehicle to go to many places)
  • Affordability (passengers don’t pay much to use it) 
  • Have existing and expanding vehicle population (therefore plenty of passengers can use it)
  • Security (allows continuous use of the railroad and no harm to the passenger and vehicle)

Finally I usually look at how active the sector is, academically (“The Paypers” and “PYMNTS.COM” for example, are academics, most of the audiences are from payment industry) as well as generally (Google, BBC, CNN, TechChurch etc). It tells me if the company  am looking at is compatible in its sector, or in other words, as a consumer of this sector, will I be better off choosing the competitor instead.


At the end of the process I summarize the list of topics I want to look at, throughout this year, that fits the above criteria
  • Material: Block Chain Technology
  • Vehicle: Mobile Wallets; Cryptocurrency
  • Railroad: Integrated Solutions; Mobile Terminal

I want to look at the sector development, the previous and current major players and the major investments (which indicates how the industry used to see the future and how they see future now). As Joby Orlowsky, VP of Discover Global Network (as I think Discover is a perfect company to use to predict the future), kindly put it "It is an exciting time in the payments business. The pace of change is like never before and only continues to accelerate.” As a infrastructure business, looking at opportunities and working on it is exciting, because you know at least from the high level, you have a future.


Reference:


Popular posts from this blog

4 Techniques to Make Your UX Review Meetings Successful

As a product manager, I often need to sit down with the executive management team to get their feedback on the new designs. It can be a frustrating process and many times I found that I cannot get things down in the time I am allowed to have.
Nevertheless, not having the sign-off from management is terrible for the team, we face high risk of having to re-work (yes, we always need to re-work, but it feels better if it is an improvement), schedule get delayed etc.
Over my 200+ review meetings, i've came to understand the reasons and learnt skills on how to stir the meeting towards an efficient completion, and I want to share them with you.
There are 4 key reasons of an unsuccessful product review meeting: 
1. Audience Lack the Background Knowledge: especially when introducing a new function, executives don’t know what they are looking at, or how the end users will be using such function, you may have sent the presentation before and again in the meeting invite, it doesn’t matter;

2. T…

What Changes will Machines Bring to us - As Employees

Machine learning to the employment has been a topic in debate. Darrell West, in his paper titled "What happens if robots take the jobs? The impact of emerging technologies on employment and public policy” suggested a list of actions government should take to ensure people whose job has been replaced by machines can live a decent live. The general sentiment seems to suggest a turbulent era as work force transform.

Growing up in China during the time of State owned enterprise reform, I had real experience living through the time of large group of people being laid off because the jobs were suddenly gone. My parent’s generation had to learn new skills for a completely new industry at their 40s and 50s. Few of them made it and even became millionaire, many of them didn’t and the family suffered a lot. I followed the news of Detroit Car manufacturing industry lapse and it shows familiar traits. The fact is, jobs come and go all the time, employee as a group will constantly adapt while …

21 Tops on How to Write a Successful Blog

Hubspot and General Assembly came together to offer a 10 week planner for successful blog. The type of blog discussed in this plan are corporate blogs used to bring people to the site and explore what the company is doing, potentially generate a lead.




Identify Your Target Persona: talk to sales team and research contract dataStart Building Evergreen Content: start with evergreen contents that stay relevant though time; do keyword search to see what people are searchingChoose the Right Content Management Tool: a good tool is easy to use and allow users to track metrics such as conversion rate, page view, and where traffic come fromDesign Your Blog: consistent layout; Focus on Your Content Strategy: basically it is depending on what you wantSet Subscriber Path: there needs to be a workflow for emailing the subscriber, a subscription form and an unsubscribe form. Hubspot is towards the "don’t email your subscribers too often” group while I also heard UI Breakfast Jane Portman talked …