Skip to main content

What I Learnt from Comparing Payment Industry with Railway Industry

5 years as product manager in Payment industry, I’ve worked on products from mobile wallet to gateway, and know how each player in the industry work and make or loss money. I consider payment industry as an infrastructure industry, an enabler for value exchange and creation. Let me explain why:

When I say infrastructure, you may think about railways, roads, cellular network etc, the main characteristics of these systems are: 
  • Massive and connected (in most places); 
  • End users don’t consume the network directly but through a “vehicle” (train of the railway; car for the road etc); 
  • End users of the network pay to use the facility; 
  • Ownership differ by level of criticalness (most important owned by gov, regulators or MNC; smaller ones by province, city or companies); 
  • Network owners and “vehicle” owners are in constant conflicts that both facilitate and hold back innovation.

And payment industry is the same:
  • All providers are connected (or you can’t pay while traveling);
  • Credit cards, debit cards, cheques and cash etc are the “vehicle” of payment industry
  • Merchants and consumers pay various fees for using the network (“Merchant Discount Rate” or MDR is the most typical fee)
  • National switch connect banks and financial institutions are usually owned by the country, card schema (Visa/MasterCard) are almost regulators and  mobile wallets (e.g. PayPal) and other smaller parts owned by others;
  • The most recent struggle being on mobile payment, it is a “vehicle” innovation, when the “vehicle” hits the road, the road is not supporting because it needs an upgrade to support such “vehicle”, the wrestling goes on

The reason I am making this comparison is because it makes it easier to understand what is the current situation and what will be the likely future for the payment industry, in other words, where the opportunities and threats and how we “define” them.
L
ooking at the railroad industry for example, we know that simply, the innovation is either about the railway or the “vehicle”. Take the 2 newsletter I received from “The Paypers” and “PYMNTS.COM” yesterday, the list of articles are as follows:
  • SIX Payment Services deploys smart payment terminals for the Swiss Post (Railroad)
  • Paytm integrates UPI payments system for wallet recharge  (Railroad)
  • Amazon sets off pilot programme in India for people selling old products  (Railroad)
  • Kraken announces the support for Monero trading on its platform  (Railroad)
  • Bitcoin Breaks $1,000 (Vehicle)
  • More Holiday Shoppers Made Mobile Purchases This Season (Vehicle)
  • The Traditional Payments Player Role in The FinTech World (Railroad and Vehicle)

These articles represents 70% of all the articles in the newsletters, the other 30%, of course, is about regulation and crimes.  These two creates their own market, the more regulation, the more crime; the more crime, the more regulation. One thing they don’t create, in most cases, is “Value” and “Opportunities". If everybody drive in a good way, we don’t need traffic lights and police.

So what are the key indicators of a company or technology that suggest if it is an “opportunity”?

First, let’s see if it is “Railroad” or “vehicle” or how the “Railroad” or “vehicle” can use it, take the block chain technology for example, it is a material, which is great because the whole network will be using it. ApplePay for example, is a “vehicle”, actually, it is more like a better wheel on a old car (credit card) that runs on the same road (contactless terminals).

Then let’s look at if it process the key criteria to be successful in the sector it belongs. For example, as a payment material it needs to fulfill one or several of the following criteria:
  • Reduce cost (producing, transporting, exchanging, circulating, ownership and governance)
  • Increase speed (producing, transporting, exchanging, circulating and verifying)

If it is “vehicle”, then the key criteria will be:

  • Affordability (it can be created and bought and used in an inexpensive way; money wise and effort wise)
  • Have existing and expanding end points (therefore plenty of places to use it)
  • Security (allows continuous use of the vehicle and no harm to the railroad and passenger)

If it is a “railroad”, then the key criteria will be:

  • Connectivity (it enables a vehicle to go to many places)
  • Affordability (passengers don’t pay much to use it) 
  • Have existing and expanding vehicle population (therefore plenty of passengers can use it)
  • Security (allows continuous use of the railroad and no harm to the passenger and vehicle)

Finally I usually look at how active the sector is, academically (“The Paypers” and “PYMNTS.COM” for example, are academics, most of the audiences are from payment industry) as well as generally (Google, BBC, CNN, TechChurch etc). It tells me if the company  am looking at is compatible in its sector, or in other words, as a consumer of this sector, will I be better off choosing the competitor instead.


At the end of the process I summarize the list of topics I want to look at, throughout this year, that fits the above criteria
  • Material: Block Chain Technology
  • Vehicle: Mobile Wallets; Cryptocurrency
  • Railroad: Integrated Solutions; Mobile Terminal

I want to look at the sector development, the previous and current major players and the major investments (which indicates how the industry used to see the future and how they see future now). As Joby Orlowsky, VP of Discover Global Network (as I think Discover is a perfect company to use to predict the future), kindly put it "It is an exciting time in the payments business. The pace of change is like never before and only continues to accelerate.” As a infrastructure business, looking at opportunities and working on it is exciting, because you know at least from the high level, you have a future.


Reference:


Popular posts from this blog

4 Techniques to Make Your UX Review Meetings Successful

As a product manager, I often need to sit down with the executive management team to get their feedback on the new designs. It can be a frustrating process and many times I found that I cannot get things down in the time I am allowed to have.
Nevertheless, not having the sign-off from management is terrible for the team, we face high risk of having to re-work (yes, we always need to re-work, but it feels better if it is an improvement), schedule get delayed etc.
Over my 200+ review meetings, i've came to understand the reasons and learnt skills on how to stir the meeting towards an efficient completion, and I want to share them with you.
There are 4 key reasons of an unsuccessful product review meeting: 
1. Audience Lack the Background Knowledge: especially when introducing a new function, executives don’t know what they are looking at, or how the end users will be using such function, you may have sent the presentation before and again in the meeting invite, it doesn’t matter;

2. T…

How to Do Market Research and Competitor Benchmarking

Congratulation, you have validated your business idea from the people around you and it looks good in their eyes. You want to go ahead and start working on the idea.
No matter if you are a veteran in the industry and have good connections to help you start; or your idea came from your personal experience while you have little experience on the market.The first thing you will end up doing is market research.
Remember, you are doing the research to: Make sure the idea in a correct way;Identify what your end users are comparing toUnderstand what challenges you will face;See how you can make money;
You are not doing the research to: Copy what the other companies are doing Exhaust all potential competitors in the market
What I always to, is a 5+1 market analysis. In the beginning, I would start with a 5-day analysis with the following schedule:
Day 1: Find a list of companies that are targeting the same end users you want to approach 
For most of us, finding the list of companies that are target…

Indie Game: What Developers Should Do and PLayers Should Play

What does indie game stands for? What is the market and market growth for indie games?
Indie games are video games that are created without the support of a publisher (E.g. EA games; Microsoft etc). Indie game developers am to bring innovation to the market, they focus on digital channels (APP stores; online marketplace) to distribute the games.
Perhaps James Swirsky And Lisanne Pajot's movie "Indie Game" best visualize the community working on indie games. This is a group of entrepreneurs seeking to realize their ideal, keep refining the work they have done and hope to find others who believe the same.
I researched on the well recognized forums, bloggers, and platform operators (E.f. Steam) to construct a comprehensive list of 100+ popular indie games to try to see what criteria are important for a good indie game. 

My logic is: indie game mostly face serious gamers (people who spend a significant hours of their week playing games), there are certain special requirements fr…